Online Deliberation: Perspectives from Discourse Analysis
Informacje ogólne
Kod przedmiotu: | 00-FF-ODP |
Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
Nazwa przedmiotu: | Online Deliberation: Perspectives from Discourse Analysis |
Jednostka: | Instytut Pedagogiki |
Grupy: |
Fakultatywne dla 6 sem (PE) pedagogiki, (3-l) stacjonarne I stopnia |
Punkty ECTS i inne: |
0 LUB
2.00
(w zależności od programu)
|
Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
Rodzaj przedmiotu: | fakultatywne |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2023/2024" (w trakcie)
Okres: | 2024-02-19 - 2024-09-30 |
Przejdź do planu
PN WT ŚR CZ PT |
Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 30 godzin, 20 miejsc
|
|
Koordynatorzy: | (brak danych) | |
Prowadzący grup: | (brak danych) | |
Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Zaliczenie na ocenę
Ćwiczenia - Zaliczenie na ocenę |
|
Skrócony opis: |
Consider the contemporary proliferation of online spaces that provide us with opportunities to comment on politics: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, online newspapers and many more. In fact, most newspapers host online comment sections where you can discuss news stories and debate politics with other members of the target audience. Most of these online sites not only allow us to share opinions, but to comment on other people’s opinions, and therefore to collaboratively create meaning through debate. We can agree, disagree, and contest the meaning of current political events and its implications for our future. In academic terms, we refer to this exchange of ideas as democratic deliberation. However, while this kind of exchange might sound productive and idyllic, problems abound. These opportunities for discussion pose difficult questions: What actually happens in these online platforms? Do we really share ideas constructively? Do we work together to understand political developments and think about how to achieve a more socially just future? In fact, what actually counts as a constructive exchange of ideas? This seminar is designed to help us think though such questions, and we focus specifically on conducting a discourse analysis of democratic deliberation. We will consider competing models of deliberation and engage questions around the discursively practices that are considered conducive to productive debate. |
|
Literatura: |
Readings: Adams, B.E. 2014. Reason-giving in deliberative forums. Journal of Public Deliberation 10(2): 1-27. Conradie, M. and Brokensha, S. 2018. A discourse analysis of audience deliberation in online forums on face-relevant news. Acta Academica. 50(1): 1-27. Curato, N., Niemeyer, S. and Dryzek, J.S. 2013. Appreciative and contestatory inquiry in deliberative forums: can group hugs be dangerous? Critical Policy Studies7(1): 1-17. Friberg-Fernros, H. and Schaffer, J.K. 2014. The consensus paradox: Does deliberative agreement impede rational discourse? PoliticalStudies 62(1): 99-116. |
|
Uwagi: |
To pass weekly presence and active participation are required. Students may expect small weekly tasks for self-study, and a final essay or research report. |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie.